INVESTORS TAKE NOTE: WHY DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN REPAIRS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO INVESTMENT PROPERTY MATTERS TO SARS

In the realm of tax assessment, understanding the difference between "repairs" and "improvements" is of paramount importance, especially when determining a taxpayer's taxable income expenditure of a capital nature.

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) acknowledges this significance and, on 16th May 2023, released an updated Interpretation Note 74 to help taxpayers grasp the distinction more clearly.

According to Section 11(d) of the Income Tax Act of 1962, taxpayers are allowed to deduct the expenditure incurred on repairs for the purposes of trade. This applies to immovable property provided that the property is either used for trade purposes or generates income. However, it's crucial to note that the deduction only covers expenditures on repairs and not improvements.

To be eligible for a deduction under Section 11(d), the repairs must genuinely restore the immovable property. If the taxpayer has already recouped the repair costs through insurance claims, guarantees, securities, or indemnities, no further deduction is permitted.

The Act does not explicitly define "repair," but it has been elucidated through court rulings. In essence, a repair involves renewing, renovating, or restoring damaged or decayed parts, regardless of whether the damage resulted from events like storms, fires, civil unrest, or merely wear and tear from regular use. As long as the expenditure complies with the essential elements of a repair, it qualifies for deduction, including expenses incurred for maintenance purposes.

While distinguishing between repairs and improvements can sometimes be tricky, courts have developed general principles to help discern the differences:

• The repaired asset must have suffered damage or deterioration necessitating replacement.
• The materials used for repair need not be identical to the original ones replaced.
• The primary objective of the work must be to restore the asset to its original condition, not to create an improvement.
• If repairs and improvements are carried out concurrently but can be identified separately, the repairs may still qualify for deduction.
• A repair must be distinguished from a renewal; the more extensive the restoration work concerning the entirety of the asset, the less likely it is considered a repair.
• If something is added to an asset that was not there previously, it typically constitutes an improvement rather than a repair.
  

Taxpayers should be mindful that deductions claimed for repairs might be recouped by SARS under section 8(4)(a) in specific situations, such as when the repair costs are recovered through insurance claims or damages.

In conclusion, comprehending the differentiation between repairs and improvements is crucial for taxpayers when considering deductions and taxable income. By adhering to the principles outlined in the updated Interpretation Note 74, taxpayers can ensure they meet the requirements for legitimate deductions while avoiding potential complications with SARS.

For more information, contact INTRO REAL ESTATE, it’s the right choice!